Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:25

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Red Dead Redemption's John Marston Actor Teases "Exciting News" Coming Soon - GameSpot
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Has a psychic ever made a crazy prediction that turned out to be true?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 now shows you microtransaction ads when you swap weapons - Eurogamer
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Patriots Minicamp Notebook: Moving into the red zone - 98.5 The Sports Hub
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Troubling Case Links Vaping to Aggressive Lung Cancer - Gizmodo
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Would you respect the US with a woman as president?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: